Monthly Archive for November, 2009

Defensive Offensive

Fifty dollars and a respectable-looking business card are enough to gain admission to the five-day Dubai Air Show that begins this Sunday.  Organizers expect to draw 50,000 people and 900 exhibitors, up from 45,000 and 850 in 2007.  Then, regional governments purchased an incredible $100 billion in new aircraft, both commercial and defense-related.  With Gulf economies emerging from the global recession against a backdrop of a Yemeni-Saudi border conflict and the apparent rising specter of Iran, this year’s show is likely to exhibit two broad trends:  commercial orders will be down and military orders will be up.

Emirates Airline and the aircraft leasing firm LCAL, both Dubai-based, are exploring the postponement and cancellation of orders of Boeing 787 Dreamliners in advance of the show.

Meanwhile, the attention-getting Eurofighter Typhoon, Europe’s most advanced fighter jet, is making its first appearance in Dubai.  Saudi Arabia already has 72 of them from a 2007 deal worth $8.86 billion.  As in years past, there will be more than a little bit of keeping up with the GCC Joneses in evidence for 2009— Qatar, the UAE and even Oman have all expressed an interest in placing orders for the Eurofighter.

The Dubai Air Show follows the 9th International Defence Exhibition and Conference (IDEX), held every other year in Abu Dhabi, the largest such event in the Gulf.  Journalist Robert Fisk penned an account of the 2001 IDEX in his book “The Great War for Civilisation,” (something of a doorstop, the description begins on page 926 out of a total 1283 pages).   Fisk spares little effort in hiding his disgust. He stops to talk with Mikhail Kalashnikov, the aging inventor of the AK-47, then manning a stall in the Russian pavilion.   Kalashnikov suggests a time in the future when his weapons “will be no more used or necessary.”  To say the least, Fisk is doubtful.  The author then moves on to the Iranian pavilion where he finds an arms dealer, Morteza Khosravi, selling a missile called the “Horror of Death.”  Khosravi repeats a line familiar to contemporary Iranian discourse: Iran, a peaceful state, has weapons and will also sell them, but each is true only for the purposes of self-defense.

At present, Russia is considering the sale of S300 missiles to Iran.  The S300 is capable of shooting down cruise missiles and aircraft— under pressure from Washington,  and to the exasperation of Iranian officials, the order has been held up for months.  Russia is also weighing sales to the other side of escalating tensions—Saudi Arabia may soon spend $2 billion on S400 missile defense from the Kremlin.

In an October 10th interview, former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal explained, “We are concerned not just as a government but as a people because geographically Iran is next door to us.”  As the receipts for military hardware pile up in Dubai over the next week, one could be forgiven for losing their sense of scale. Theories of deterrence may well drive sales but they will also go ignored— Iran’s annual military budget is a paltry $7.31 billion.  That amount of money, even with some impossibly deft maneuvering around sanctions, is merely enough to buy Tehran several dozen Eurofighter Typhoons.

-SW

Guards Win $2.5b Chabahar Rail Contract

Today from the BBC:

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have won a $2.5bn tender to build a railway route linking the south-eastern port of Chabahar to Iran’s rail network.

Transport minister Hamid Behbahani said it was part of a transit route for goods from Chabahar to the north-eastern border town of Sarakhs.

The Guards’ engineering wing, Khatam-ol-Anbia, has been awarded government contracts worth billions of dollars.

The BBC article puts the rail contract in context of the IRGC’s increasing influence in Iran’s economy and politics.  Certainly a valid angle, but there is a bit more to the story.  Chabahar is one of Iran’s coastal free zones, meant both to create Iranian jobs and to boost Iranian trade with Central Asia.  The port was reinvigorated in 2004 and has been financed almost entirely by India, as a rival to Pakistan’s nearby Gwadar port (Registan has a useful backgrounder on the two ports here).  The railroad in question will link Chabahar to the Turkmen border, thus giving India a trade route to Central Asia that bypasses Pakistan.  The original article (Farsi) makes no mention of any Indian financing for the deal, but given the gobs of money they’ve spent on developing Chabahar I wouldn’t be surprised if they are paying for the rails too.

-WW

Al-Alam Cutoff as Tehran-Riyadh Tensions Mount

al_alam_logoAs the recent Saudi air and ground raids along the Yemeni border intensified, Egypt’s Nilesat TV network and Saudi-owned Arabsat simultaneously dropped Iran’s Arabic-language news station al-Alam (The World) from service.  When living in Cairo I would occasionally tune into the station and watch some of their bog standard pro-Iranian news coverage or a stale documentary about the Iran-Iraq war.  To me, the real surprise  was that Egypt and Saudi Arabia would continue to allow the Iranian propaganda station on their satellites at all during a time when the two states were locked in a media war with Tehran.

The “media war,” going strong since mid-2008, was equal parts vicious and absurd: for the absurd see my article at ISN from a while back on a bungled Iranian documentary film portraying Sadat’s assassin, Khaled Islamboli,  as a martyr, and for vicious, see the Egyptian accusations that radicalized pro-Iranian Egyptians  committed last year’s Khan el-Khalili bombing.  Another facet was Arab accusations of Iranian proselytizing of Shi’a  Islam around the Arab world.

Was al-Alam taking the Houthi rebels’  side in coverage of the current strikes?  A quick scan of articles on al-Alam’s front page indicates that they were, but the thrust was more anti-Saudi, casting Riyadh as the aggressor, than it was pro-Houthi.  But the anti-Saudi messaging is hardly stronger than the stuff that al-Alam had been broadcasting (on Saudi and Egyptian satellite bandwidth) for the last few years.

The question of  material Iranian aid for the Houthi rebels, which have been fighting the Yemeni central government in on-off wars since 2004,  is much more murky.  The Yemeni army has essentially blockaded the Sa’ada Governorate, and cut off access to independent  press or NGOs to the warzone for the last few years (Although HRW put out an excellent report on the situation a few years back, which is here).  Absent reliable information, accusations of Iranian funding for the Huthi rebels, who are Zaidi Shi’a (as opposed to Iran’s Twelvers), have flown and been multiplied amid tense regional circumstances.

But after spending several days protesting its own involvement, today, Iran’s Mottaki fired away at Saudi Arabia for its interference in Yemen.  BBC snippet:

A country which seeks a role to establish peace and stability in all countries in the region… cannot have a role in creating tensions,” Mr Mottaki said.

“We strongly warn the regional countries to be careful, to be vigilant,” he added.

“Monetary aid, providing arms to extremist and terrorist groups or actually taking action against them and crushing those groups or the people and embarking on military operations – these all will have negative consequences.”

In an apparent reference to Saudi Arabia, with whom Tehran has had hostile relations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Mr Mottaki said there were “certain people who add fuel to some crises”.

“Those people should be assured that the smoke and the fire they have ignited will entangle them themselves,” he added.

This incident, far from over, has taken Saudi-Iranian tensions to their highest point in years.  At very least, the episode will further hamstring those who seek to integrate Iran into the region and help those pushing the Sunni-Shia strife narrative.  At worst, we could have a potentially destabilizing conflict in Southern Arabia.  Either way, the citizens of Sa’ada will continue to pay a heavy price, as international attention is focused elsewhere.

-WW

Viewing

If you have about seven extra hours to spare this week  I highly recommend watching the proceedings of the recent  University of Maryland conference on Iran that brought together many of the top pro-negotiation voices.  I’m working on a longer roundup piece on US-Iran negotiations, but in the meantime the link is here.

-WW